Legal Opinion

City National Bank of Dallas v. Dunham, Buckley & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. W. J. J. Smith.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKHOUT, Associate Justice.

The statement of the case contained in appellant’s brief is substantially correct, and is adopted. On June 7, 1897, Dunham, Buckley & Co., John Pullman & Co., and Arnold,, Constable & Co. filed their joint petition against I. Goldsmith & Co., E. M. Beardon, and B. Liebman, and on June 9, 1897, they filed their first amended original petition against the same defendants, and alleged that petitioners were creditors of I. Goldsmith & Co., had instituted their respective suits against I. Goldsmith & Co., and had caused writs of garnishment to issue and be served on B.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cahn v. James G. Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Federal Life Ins. Co. v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Keep 'Em Eating Co. v. HulingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Rische v. RischeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Sanborn v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Local Union No. 123 v. Dorothy Frocks Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API