Legal Opinion
State v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1982No. 82-271PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
Pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 29.02, subd. 4 (1980), the district court has certified to this court as important and doubtful the question of the admissibility of a confession made by defendant, who is being prosecuted on a charge of first-degree murder, to his probation agent. The issues raised by the appeal relate to whether the confession was obtained in violation of defendant’s privilege against compelled self-incrimination, which is contained in U.S.Const. amend. V.
*341In 1974 defendant was twice questioned by Minneapolis Police in connection with the murder of a 17-year-old…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Marrs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- State v. John PowersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.