Legal Opinion · Dissent

Middleton v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 5, 1988No. 1488Published

1DissentRobert M. Bell, Judge

I dissent.

My disagreement with the majority is both strong and basic.1 As I see it, the issue is whether, having vacated a jury’s guilty verdict on the grounds of inconsistency, the trial court could, without offending the prohibition against double jeopardy, reinstate that verdict. I totally reject the notion that the majority espouses, that the verdict was vacated “as a predicate to the award of a new trial.” And, contrary to the majority’s resolution of the issue, I am of the view that the answer is unequivocally “no.”

To place the matter in context, it must be reiterated that the jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Pugh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API