Middleton v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1DissentRobert M. Bell, Judge
I dissent.
My disagreement with the majority is both strong and basic.1 As I see it, the issue is whether, having vacated a jury’s guilty verdict on the grounds of inconsistency, the trial court could, without offending the prohibition against double jeopardy, reinstate that verdict. I totally reject the notion that the majority espouses, that the verdict was vacated “as a predicate to the award of a new trial.” And, contrary to the majority’s resolution of the issue, I am of the view that the answer is unequivocally “no.”
To place the matter in context, it must be reiterated that the jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pugh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.