Chambersburg Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Wecht
I respectfully dissent. While the learned majority dismisses this appeal as improvidently granted, I believe that this long-pending case instead warrants a prec-edential opinion.
We granted allocatur in order to interpret the meaning of the phrase “engage in a secondary boycott” as codified in Section 6(2)(d) of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act (“PLRA”), 43 P.S. § 211.6(2)(d). This is an issue of first impression. Our *193Court has received substantial briefing and oral argument from the parties and amici curiae. We are now well-positioned to issue an opinion interpreting the statutory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Philadelphia Fire Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Borough of Nazareth v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Kerr v. Butler Building Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Lescher Building Service, Inc. v. Local Union No. 133 of the Sheet Metal Workers International AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.