Legal Opinion
State v. Azar
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 29, 2019No. 6:19-cv-00317-MC (Lead Case); 6:19-cv-00318-MC (Trailing Case)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MCSHANE, Judge:
Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are 20 states, the District of Columbia, the American Medical Association, the Oregon Medical Association, the Planned Parenthood Federation and their local affiliates, and individual medical providers. They seek to enjoin the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Population Affairs, and their respective leadership (collectively, the "Defendants" or "HHS") from implementing certain rules (the "Final Rule") that would alter the family planning program established by Title X of the Public Health Service Act,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of California v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Mayor of Balt. v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- California by and through Becerra v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.