Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 2004No. 1020344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State of Alabama petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari, which we granted, to address whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in reversing the judgment of the trial court denying Rodgrick Cornilius Brooks's second Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief. The Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that Brooks might have been entitled to an out-of-time appeal from the dismissal of his first Rule 32 petition based on the authority of Ex parte Fountain,842 So.2d 726 (Ala. 2001), and Ex parte Johnson, 806 So.2d 1195 (Ala. 2001). We reverse and remand.

The record…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ex Parte CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ex Parte FountainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StephensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API