Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Hawks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from, Wabaunsee District Court. Partition. Judgment for plaintiff Hawks, at the March term, 1887. The defendants Stratton and two others bring the case here. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

The defendant in error, Isadora Hawks, filed her petition in the district court of Wabaunsee county in April, 1885, in which she demanded partition of certain real estate, alleging that she was the owner of an undivided half thereof and that Levi Stratton was the owner of the other half. Stratton answered, denying her ownership of an undivided half of the land, and claiming that one Jacob Beard was the owner of that part of the land claimed by her. Jacob Beard and Permelia his wife, by permission of the court, were made parties, and they filed answers claiming that Jacob…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brock v. CottinghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Williams v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dryden v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Dyal v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. National Bank of Guthrie v. EarlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Huebert v. SappioSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API