People v. Dazzo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty is addressed to the sound discretion of the Supreme Court, and its determination generally will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]; People v Caruso, 88 AD3d 809 [2011]; People v Amanze, 87 AD3d 1159 [2011]; People v Perez, 83 AD3d 738, 739 [2011]). “When a defendant moves to withdraw a guilty plea, the nature and extent of the fact-finding…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. TinsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. SeeberNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. PelaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. EdmunsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. UpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.