Knox v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agriculture Implement Workers
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brings an action for damages and injunctive relief under Title 1 of the Landrum-Griffln Act, 29 U.S.C. § 412, effective September 14, 1959. The defendants move to dismiss because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and, in the alternative, because the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter.
Plaintiff, an employee of Ford Motor Company, was suspended from the defendant union in 1953. He alleges that this dismissal was improper and that he is therefore entitled under 29 U.S.C. § 411(a) (5) to the restoration of all the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lankford v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lankford v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1960
- Durandetti v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
- John F. Lankford v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Krulikowsky v. Metropolitan District Council of Philadelphia & VicinityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Knox v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft, & Agricultural Implement WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Knox v. International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965