Legal Opinion
Permian Basin Area Rate Cases
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 25, 1968No. 90PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
390 U.S. 747 (1968)
PERMIAN BASIN AREA RATE CASES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 5-7, 1967.
Decided May 1, 1968.[*]
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
Richard A. Solomon argued the cause for the Federal Power Commission. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Richard A. Posner, Peter H. Schiff, Leo E. Forquer, David J. Bardin and Alan J. Roth.
J. Calvin Simpson argued the cause for the Public Utilities Commission of California; Malcolm H. Furbush argued the cause for the Pacific Gas & Electric Co.; John Ormasa…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Harlan; Dissent.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015