Legal Opinion

Martin v. J. Lichtman & Sons

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 6, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*82On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, where the following opinion was filed.

“Martin was awarded workmen’s compensation by the Division, the County Court reversed, and Martin appeals.

Martin was having his lunch in a room in the Lichtman plant customarily used by its employees for that purpose. There were about 18 employees in the room, and Martin was seated between Bradford and Taylor. Martin interpreted a remark made by Bradford to Taylor as meaning that Bradford had a job in addition to his employment with Lichtman, and he said to Bradford ‘You got two jobs?…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. J. Lichtman & SonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API