Transparent Ruler Co. v. C-Thru Ruler Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was based on unfair competition by the defendants in offering for sale and ad vertising articles bearing the number of a patent which belongs to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claimed an injunction, an accounting and damages. The court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed.
Under the view which we take of the case, the salient facts in the court’s finding, which is subject to no material correction, may be thus summarized: The plaintiff Aronson is president of the plaintiff company, which sells rulers and measuring instruments made of transparent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Eastern Wine Corporation v. Winslow-Warren, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yale University v. BennesonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Vermont Motor Co. v. MonkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
- Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- State v. TrumbullConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- State v. TrumbullConnecticut Appellate Court · 1962