Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Bromanbro Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered on June 9, 1964, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to strike the first decretal paragraph providing for the allowance of commissions (to .the receiver and the allowance of fees .to his attorney, and to provide in lieu thereof that the receiver shall be allowed the sum of $115.40 on account of his expenses and disbursements and the attorney for the receiver allowed the sum of $500 for his services; and the order otherwise affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Bearing in mind the nature and extent of the services rendered 'by…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amusement Distributors, Inc. v. Oz Forum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Goldman v. BernardiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Aloi v. Lizeric Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In Re Studio 54 Disco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API