Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1997No. A97A0860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Howard Johnson appeals his sentence of life without parole under OCGA § 17-10-7 (b) (2), arguing that the application of this Code section in his case violates the prohibition against ex post facto application of statutes. The offense for which he is being sentenced occurred after the effective date of this Code section, however. Accordingly, ex post facto considerations do not prohibit application of OCGA § 17-10-7 (b) (2), and we affirm defendant’s sentence.

In 1986, defendant was convicted of armed robbery (seven counts). Effective January 1, 1995, OCGA §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Landers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Lloyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Cofer v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Hindman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API