Miller v. Glass

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment. The sole issue in controversy is whether plaintiff’s complaint stated a cause of action. In determining this point, plaintiff’s allegations must be accepted as true. Upon this *361premise, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in holding that his “action has no merit” and in entering judgment in favor of defendants. The record sustains plaintiff’s position.

Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that defendants “without warrant or other process of any kind” arrested him upon the “sole charge of failing, neglecting, and refusing to exhibit upon…