Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murray v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1946No. 31172Published

1DissentFelton, J.

“The negotiable instruments law purports to be a codification of the law merchant, or the common law with reference to negotiable instruments. . . The act . . when adopted in a particular jurisdiction becomes pro tanto the law respecting negotiable instruments in that jurisdiction, and supersedes the law merchant obtaining in that jurisdiction as to all matters covered by the provisions of the act.” Beasley Hardware Co. v . Stevens, 42 Ga. App. 114, 118 (155 S. E. 67). Immediately prior to the passage of the negotiable instruments law in Georgia there was no statutory exception to the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Moore v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TapleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Kendall v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API