Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 7842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this suit to recover from defendant upon an alleged contract of settlement and for damages resulting from alleged fraudulent misrepresentations by defendant. Defendant’s answer denies the existence of a contract and the making of fraudulent representations. Plaintiffs have moved to amend their complaint in certain particulars and defendant has moved for judgment on the pleadings and to dismiss on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. These motions are before- us for disposition.

*176Plaintiffs’ motion to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. Frank Adam Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. United States v. KoikeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Katz v. Olney Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In re David M. Hunt Construction Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API