Legal Opinion

Kulp v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1922No. Appeal, 235PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiff was injured while riding as a guest in an automobile, which was struck and wrecked by an electric car of the defendant company. She recovered a verdict and judgment in the court below and the defendant appeals. The only matters suggested for consideration by the statement of the question involved, contained in the brief of appellant, are: Did the court err in the rulings which may thus be summarized; striking off the judgment of non pros which had been entered under a rule of court; and in refusing, upon the trial, to give binding instructions in favor of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Minnich v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Beck v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Sieb v. Central Pennsylvania Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Saint Vladimir Ukrainian Orthodox Church v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Moore v. George Heebner, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Bucci v. Detroit Fire & Marine Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Gates v. Servicemaster Commercial ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API