HML Corp. v. General Foods Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, District Judge.
This contract action was tried to the Court without a jury from December 7, 1964, to December 10, 1964. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant moved for an involuntary dismissal under Rule 41(b) which was granted by the Court. Therefore, in accordance with Rule 52(a) we find the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The plaintiff, HML Corporation (HML) (formerly Lamaze Foods, Inc.) is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2. At the time of the institution of suit, January 5, 1962, HML was a food…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Rubinger v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Oregon Plywood Sales Corporation v. Sutherlin Plywood Corporation and Nordic Plywood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Cream Wipt Foods, Inc. v. General Foods CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960