Legal Opinion

Thurston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 22, 2006No. 4D05-4026PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

920 So.2d 1229 (2006)

John THURSTON, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-4026.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 22, 2006.

John Thurston, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

2Per curiam

The order striking appellant's successive 3.800(a) motion is affirmed. Because we find that appellant has abused the right to pro se access to courts by filing repetitious and frivolous pleadings, thereby diminishing the ability of this court to devote its finite resources to the consideration of legitimate claims, we impose sanctions.

In April 1996, the victim entered the…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Logan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. ROKER v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Waterfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Mason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API