Legal Opinion

Cochrane v. Pacific States Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 6, 1933No. 13,069PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The plaintiffs below, defendants in error here, are life insurance corporations organized and existing under the laws of the state of Colorado. Each of them is a legal reserve company and under its charter is a joint stock company and has power to make insurance upon lives and to issue health and accident insurance and to grant, purchase and dispose of annuities, and is duly licensed and authorized by the insurance commissioner of Colorado to carry on such business. The Pacific States company since its organization has been actually engaged in the business of insurance in Colorado and other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Alliance Mutual Life Assurance Society of the United States v. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Illinois Life Ins. v. TullyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Relfe v. Columbia Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. The People v. . the New England Mutual Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ogden First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  2. State v. BanksNevada Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API