Legal Opinion

Mill & Mine Supply Co. v. Page & Bolster Shingle Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1921No. 16582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Grilliam, J., entered February 15, 1921, decreeing distribution of proceeds of a receiver’s sale in favor of lien creditors, in preference to the state’s claim for industrial compensation.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In 1920, the defendant, Page & Bolster Shingle Company, was operating a small sawmill. On October 6,1920, it became insolvent and ceased operat*372ing. At that time it had on hand approximately 325,000 feet of lumber, and was indebted to plaintiff Whitney and other employees in excess of $3,000 for wages in the operation, of the mill. On October 19, the plaintiff Whitney and other employees filed liens against the lumber under the provisions of Bern. Code, § 1152 et seq. These liens were assigned to plaintiff Whitney, who commenced the first of the above entitled consolidated cases for their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scandinavian American Bank v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LawtonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. C. S. Barlow & Sons v. H. & B. Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. John A. Roeblings Sons Co. v. Frederickson Logging & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. In re C. A. Taylor Logging & Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API