Legal Opinion

Balboa Amusement Producing Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1918No. Civ. No. 2453PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WORKS, J., pro tem.

The Balboa Amusement Producing Company was engaged in the making of motion pictures and Henry Stanley was an actor employed by it. On the day of the accident out of which this controversy arises, Stanley reported to the company for duty at the usual time in the morning, but was told that his services were not then needed. However, the rules of the business required him to remain at the plant of the company, or on the “lot,” to adopt the parlance of the motion picture industry, for possible service during the day. The situation of the company’s lot was peculiar, and out of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kimbol v. Industrial Acc. CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Fishering v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ward v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Mountain v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Torrey v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API