Thomas v. Consolidated Fire District No. 1

OPINION OF THE COURT

William J. Crangle, J.

Upon reargument the prior determination of this court (91 Misc 2d 651) is reaffirmed and the motion for summary *1067judgment by defendant, Consolidated Fire District No. 1, Town of Niskayuna, is granted.

Plaintiff urges that the court in the case of Cox v Village of Greenwich (33 AD2d 264) ruled, in effect, that section 205-b of the General Municipal Law does not provide the statutory exemption necessary for a fire district to escape liability under the rule in that case. I am unable to read that in the court’s opinion.

Addressing itself to section 50-c of…