Legal Opinion

State v. Groom

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1931No. 6,805PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Thomas Groom was convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property; he has appealed from the judgment of conviction and an order denying him a new trial.

The information charged defendant with buying a calf, knowing it to have been stolen, with the intent to prevent the owner from again possessing the property; it described the animal with particularity and alleged ownership in the United States.

The proof adduced was ample to establish the following facts: The calf was the offspring of a cow issued by the government to an Indian residing on the Cheyenne Reservation; it was stolen from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carroll v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Molt v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. HuffmanMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. MoxleyMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Ford v. DrakeMontana Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EbelMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Feldstein v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Meinecke v. SkaggsMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. NicksMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Benolken v. MiracleMontana Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API