Legal Opinion

McMillin v. Deardorff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1897No. 2,338PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

In an action brought by the appellee against one Jerome Ruch and the appellant, commenced before a justice of the peace, upon a promissory note made by the defendants, payable to the plaintiff, dated March 28, 1895, and due nine months thereafter, the appellant answered that he signed the note only as surety; that on or about the 81st day of January, 1896, he served a notice in writing on the appellee as follows: “Jan. 31, 1896. Mr.-: Sue the note which I signed as surety for Rue, or I will not *429continue to be responsible as surety. A. B. McMillin.”

It is alleged that the name “Bue”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fensler v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Barnes v. MowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Daily v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Scales v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Robbins v. . ArendtNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frye v. EisenbiessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Reiman v. Terre Haute Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API