Legal Opinion
United States v. Garcia
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 7, 2013No. Criminal Action No. 3:13-CR-00013-LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 21), filed June 10, 2013. After carefully considering the motion to suppress, response, reply, briefing, evidence, applicable law, witness testimony, and oral arguments by the parties, the court grants Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 21).
I. Factual and Procedural Background
In Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, Marcos Antonio Garcia (“Defendant” or “Garcia”) asks the court to suppress all evidence derived from and statements made as a result of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Joe CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Francheska v. Jaganathan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- United States v. CastilloDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Jaganathan, Francheska v.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. Joe CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.