Legal Opinion

Tom Trisler d/b/a Canal House Antiques v. Clayton L. Carter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2013No. 35A02-1302-SC-192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Tom Trisler (Tris-ler), d/b/a Canal House Antiques (Canal), appeals the trial court’s order which required Trisler to issue a refund to the Appellee-Plaintiff, Clayton L. Carter (Carter).

We reverse.

ISSUE

Trisler raises a single issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether trial court erred in ordering Trisler to issue a refund to Carter.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On November 19, 2011, Carter and his wife went to Canal in Wabash, Indiana. Carter purchased some tools, Christmas decorations, two chests of drawers, and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trinity Homes, LLC v. FangIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McClure Oil Corp. v. Murray Equipment, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Lae v. HouseholderIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bennett v. BroderickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Vetor v. ShockeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexin, LLC v. Olympic Metals, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Judith A. HallieIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API