State v. Ramey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
Upon an indictment charging that on May 5, 1951, he operated an automobile “while'under the influence of intoxicating liquor and narcotic drugs”, appellant was convicted and sentenced as a third offender. The exceptions raise three questions. One has been abandoned. The two for decision are whether the Court erred in refusing to quash the indict,ment, and (2) in refusing to grant a motion for a directed verdict upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction.
It was alleged in the indictment “that said offense is not a first offense, the said Bert…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- State v. StockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- State v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tyler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Sellers v. Public Savings Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Kranchick v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016