Legal Opinion

Hapaniewski v. Rustin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1989No. 88-1233PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiff, William P. Hapaniewski, appeals from an order of the trial court denying his motion for summary judgment and granting defendant John Rustin’s motion for summary judgment. Hapaniewski contends the trial court erred in concluding that he was not entitled to recover attorney fees under a contract theory and in quantum meruit, and in holding that Rustin was entitled to summary judgment on those issues.

The undisputed facts are as follows. Hapaniewski represented Rustin in an action captioned as Jupiter Petroleum Corp., Delphi American Corp., and John Rustin v. Alvin C. Johnson, Jr.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WhittingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Laff v. Chapman Performance Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Slater v. JacobsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. HellandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Berlak v. Villa Scalabrini Home for the Aged, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Raprager v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Corcoran v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter R.R. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Camelot, Inc. v. Burke Burns & Pinelli, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  5. Demarco Nichols v. Joseph LongoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API