Legal Opinion

Rauscher v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 29, 2004No. 01-01-01134-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Michael Adam Rauscher, pleaded guilty to the state jail felony of possession of marihuana after the trial court denied his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at 12 months’ confinement. In three points of error, appellant argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence on federal and state constitutional grounds for the warrantless entry into his apartment.

We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In March 2001, appellant and his wife, Tiffany Rauscher, were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Colburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Willover v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. State v. SamuolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  3. Alfonso Contreras, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. Alfonso Contreras, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. Calixto Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API