Federal Trade Commission v. Neovi, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 82], Plaintiffs opposition [Doc. No. 94], Defendants’ reply [Doc. No. 96], Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 89], Defendants’ opposition [Doc. No. 98], and Plaintiffs reply [Doc. No. 100.] For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in part.
BACKGROUND
I. Parties
De…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Tax Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. DiamondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Marty v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Federal Trade Commission v. Washington Data ResourcesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- In Re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.