Legal Opinion

Clark v. Mercer Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1929No. 18501PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The land involved in this action belonged to the Bockler family. Two of the adults executed an oil and gas mining lease to one Deaner; thereafter the guardian of the four minor children executed an oil and gas mining lease to Deaner, and thereafter the other adult owner executed an oil and gas mining lease to Deaner, thereby giving to Deaner three separate oil and gas mining leases, each covering the entire tract of land all granting to Deaner the entire leasehold interest in the property. Thereafter Deaner, by mesne conveyances, conveyed a one-half interest in the three leases and a one-half…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Beardsley v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Kinkead v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Sweeney v. Bay State Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Colonial Royalties Co. v. HindsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Strait v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Harper v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API