Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1912No. Nos. 658, 659, 660, and 661PublishedCited by 59 opinions

ERROR TO AND APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. The facts, which, involve the validity under the due process and search and seizure provisions "of the Constitution of a subpoena duces tecum to an officer of a corporation to produce .books and papers of the corporation, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO AND APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. The facts, which, involve the validity under the due process and search and seizure provisions "of the Constitution of a subpoena duces tecum to an officer of a corporation to produce .books and papers of the corporation, are stated in the opinion. The orders of commitment and the imprisonment thereunder have .deprived the plaintiffs in error and appellants of their liberty without due process of law.- The subpoena imposed no legal obligation on the corporation to produce the books and papers.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

delivered the opinion of the court..These cases arise from the following facts: On April 12, 1912, the Federal grand jury in Boston was investigating whether Warren B. Wheeler and Stillman Shaw, plaintiffs in error in Nos. 658 and 659 and appellants in Nos. 660 and 661, had, by means of a certain corporation -known as Wheeler & Shaw, Incorporated, or otherwise, violated § 215 of the act" of Congress of March 4, 1909, 35 Stat. 1088, Í130, e. 321, making it a crime to use the mails of the United States for a scheme to defraud, which crime is punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. . On the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API