Peacock Coal Co. v. Gaines Coal Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
Plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant Gaines Coal Company certain quantities of coal for which payment has not been made. There is no dispute about this. Is defendant Israel liable for the payment?
On the factual side it is shown that, about November 1, 1925, E. M. Gaines, under the trade name of E. M. Gaines Coal Company, was conducting a retail coal business on East Court Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa, and that appellant Israel entered into negotiations with Gaines to purchase an interest in said business. Israel did advance Gaines $1,000, and for security took an assignment of certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pangborn v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Lasher v. Stimson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1892
- Pennypacker v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Cunnyngham v. ShelbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Hart v. StenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Rudy-Patrick Seed Co. v. RosemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944