Legal Opinion

Lasher v. Stimson

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 8, 1892No. 176PublishedCited by 31 opinions

No. 176 July Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 816 December Term 1888, C. P. No. 2. On January 11, 1889, George F. Lasher brought assumpsit against H. D. Stimson. Issue..

Read the full summary

No. 176 July Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 816 December Term 1888, C. P. No. 2. On January 11, 1889, George F. Lasher brought assumpsit against H. D. Stimson. Issue.. At the trial, on May 18, 1890, the jury returned a special verdict as follows: “ The plaintiff, upon the order of the defendant, who professed to be acting on behalf of the Sudsena Manufacturing Co., furnished in accordance with said order certain goods and did certain work between February 10, 1888, and June 12th of the same year. The value of the goods and work was $299.55. The goods and work were charged on the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion,

Mr. Justice McCollum :

The Sudsena Manufacturing Company is a foreign corporation and the act of April 22, 1874, P. L. 108, prescribes the terms on which it may engage in business in Pennsylvania. Compliance with these is a condition precedent to its recognition and legal existence therein. It cannot, by virtue of its charter, exercise its functions beyond the territorial limits of the sovereignty which created it. It cannot transact business in other states or sovereignties without their consent expressed or implied. Any person who assumes to act for it must be considered as having…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Thorne v. Travellers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  3. Hagerman v. Empire Slate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bala Corporation v. McGlinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Model Heating Co. v. MagaritySupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pittsburgh Const. Co. v. West Side Belt R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API