Legal Opinion

Kosik v. Manchester Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 11, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

Compensation was claimed and awarded for dermatitis from cement poisoning alleged to have been sustained while at work for the employer-respondent. The commissioner found that during the latter part of June and on the morning of July 1st, 1926, the claimant was engaged in handling cement on a church job in Manchester. On the afternoon of July 1st he was transferred to the work of digging a cellar and clearing land in Bolton Center and worked there until noon of July 3d. In the evening of that day he began to feel an itch on his hands and arms and about his face, and on Tuesday following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Senzamici v. Waterbury Castings Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Mund v. Farmers' Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Jadovich v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Mitaly v. Crofut & KnappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Tippman v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API