Legal Opinion · Dissent

PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. City of Lancaster and PA PUC

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 2015No. 462 M.D. 2013Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

The City of Lancaster (City), a home rule municipality,1 enacted Chapter 263 of the City Code entitled “Right of Way Management” imposing certain requirements on entities whose facilities occupy the City’s right-of-way, including public utilities. The issue in this case is whether the Public Utility Code2 preempts local municipalities from including public utilities in a comprehensive management plan that seeks to regulate the occupation of the public right-of-way between the varying public and private interests whose facilities occupy the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Mercantile Library Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. In Re Appeal From Passage of Ordinance 4354 of AltoonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Babcock v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Gramlich v. Lower Southampton TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API