Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Forbes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 31, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The plaintiff, a real estate broker, brings this action to recover a commission for procuring a purchaser for the defendants’ house, land, and greenhouse in Natick. The trial judge found for the plaintiff. The Appellate Division ordered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.

There was evidence of the tenor following: Shortly before October 26, 1947, the defendants employed the plaintiff to find a customer at a price of $18,000. On Sunday October 26 the plaintiff advertised the property in a Boston newspaper, without disclosing its location. One McCole saw the advertisement and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holton v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Pacheco v. MedeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Gleason v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Sherman v. Briggs Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Corleto v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Creed v. ApogMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Frederick May & Company v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Siegel v. LoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Turner v. MinasianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Bonin v. Chestnut Hill Towers Realty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API