Legal Opinion

Rowbotham v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1976No. Docket 22700PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a Wayne County Circuit Court order of summary judgment, appar ently issued because the court believed plaintiffs had not stated a cause of action. GCR 1963, 117.2(1).

In 1969, defendant issued an automobile insurance policy to plaintiffs, but cancelled the policy when plaintiffs failed to pay the premiums. Despite the cancellation, plaintiffs submitted a claim to defendant for damages they sustained and damages they caused in an automobile accident. Defendant mistakenly paid $1,249, part to plaintiffs and part to an accident victim. On discovering the error of the payment,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brand v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Carver v. LykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Antcliff v. JuneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Spear v. PendillMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Belt v. RitterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. R.J.R. Services, Inc., Individually, and D/B/A Ron Russell and Associates, and Ronald J. Russell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Abbott Laboratories, Andrew J. Muetterties and Joseph N. Genese, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. John F. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Pauley v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API