Legal Opinion

Kopko v. Miller

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Before the Court in our original jurisdiction are cross-motions for summary relief filed by sheriffs, deputy sheriffs and district attorneys of Warren, Mercer, Bradford and Cumberland counties (collectively Sheriffs), and Jeffrey B. Miller, Commissioner (Commissioner) of the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP). We are asked whether sheriffs are “investigative or law enforcement officers” under the Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act 1 (Wiretap Act) so they may receive training and certification from the PSP to conduct wiretap investigations.

For several…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kopko v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. MarconiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. DRN, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Allegheny County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API