The Travelers Insurance Companies v. Fountain City Federal Credit Union, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
We AFFIRM the district court’s judgment permanently enjoining appellant Fountain City Federal Credit Union from garnishing or attaching any proceeds of the pension plan at issue in this case. Because we affirm on the basis of the district court’s memorandum of December 16, 1988, we reprint that opinion as an appendix below.
APPENDIX
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CLEMON, District Judge:
This case presents the issue of whether the non-alienability provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d), applies to the proceeds of an employee pension plan that is being terminated.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tenneco Inc. v. First Virginia Bank of TidewaterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Co. v. H. Ray CoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Smith v. MirmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re BartholomewUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. JohnstonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Coleman v. Hainlen (In Re Hainlen)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2007
- Silagy v. Bank One, Akron, N.A. (In Re Collin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.