Legal Opinion

Dralle v. Town of Reedsburg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Sauk-county: E. Eat SteveNS, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimliN, J.

In this action for damages resulting from, a defective highway the respondent pleaded that she “was thrown violently from the said wagon and struck on the rocks hereinbefore referred to, receiving therefrom severe and, as she is informed and verily believes, permanent injuries; . . . was rendered sick, sore, bruised,y maimed, and her life endangered, and she has suffered, and still does suffer, severe and excruciating pains.” Attached to the complaint and made part thereof is a copy of the notice served by respondent upon the town and required by sec. 1339, Stats. (1898), in which, after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mauch v. City of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Cornell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Odegard v. North Wisconsin Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Curran v. A. H. Stange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Bading v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Laffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Johnson v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Nehls v. NehlsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Schaff v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API