Perry v. . Perry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtVaeseb, J.
In summary ejectment there is, of course, only one main issue involved, and that is tenancy and the holding over. McDonald v. Ingram, 124 N. C., 272; McIver v. R. R., 163 N. C., 545. However, it naturally follows that the summary remedy in ejectment provided by statute is restricted to cases in which the relation between the parties is that of landlord and tenant. McIver v. R. R., supra; Hauser v. Morrison, 146 N. C., 248; McCombs v. Wallace, 66 N. C., 481; Hughes v. Mason, 84 N. C., 472; Fertilizer Works v. Aiken, 175 N. C., 398; Hargrove v. Cox, 180 N. C., 362.
The defendant denies that this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wm. McCombs v. . Albert WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Davis v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Hauser v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- McDonald v. . IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Armour Fertilizer Works v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Austin v. . GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Dean v. . DuvallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935