Legal Opinion

Dean v. . Duvall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ouecam.

The defendant contends that the title to the land was in controversy, and that therefore a justice of the peace did not have jurisdiction of the action.

The pertinent statutes are C. S., 1476, 1477, and 2365.

In proceedings of summary ejectment the title to land is not raised or put in controversy by mere allegation that such controversy exists. McDonald v. Ingram, 124 N. C., 272, 32 S. E., 677; Perry v. Perry, 190 N. C., 125, 129 S. E., 147; Hauser v. Morrison, 146 N. C., 248, 59 S. E., 693; McLaurin v. McIntyre, 167 N. C., 350, 83 S. E., 627; North. Carolina Practice & Procedure,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hauser v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. McLaurin v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. McDonald v. . IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. TottenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. McLaurin v. . McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API