Legal Opinion

Delafield v. Ross

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 10, 1955No. 42084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

- The sole issue for determination by this Court is the contention made by plaintiff to dismiss the appeal taken by Guy Scrog-gins.

Scroggins had taken writs to this Court, and we denied those writs with the endorsement, “Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal.”

A chronological listing is necessary in order to make the issues of law and fact understandable.

The suit presently before the Court is that of Delafield v. Ross, in which the plaintiff issued an attachment and sequestration against the partnership of Ross & Ross, who at the time were absentees. Their deposit in the bank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. MichieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  2. First National Bank v. Fort Wayne Artificial Ice Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Atkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  4. Hope v. MadisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  5. Harper v. Commercial & Railroad BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. South Street Lumber Company v. DickersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API