Legal Opinion

Pegues v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1980No. 13887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery (D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-2901, -3202), assault with a dangerous weapon (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-502), assault on a police officer while armed (D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-505, -3202), and carrying a pistol without a license (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3204). On appeal he claims that the trial judge’s failure to rule before trial on the sufficiency of his insanity defense deprived him of his rights to present a defense and to testify in his own behalf, and that the trial judge was without power to remove the insanity question from the jury.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Frendak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Bethea v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Frank W. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Gorbey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Phenis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Briggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Bell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API