Legal Opinion
Cutler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 23, 1989No. Civ. A. 85-4470, 85-6579PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
In this asbestos action, defendants named in two complaints filed by plaintiffs move, on statute of limitations grounds, for summary judgment dismissing one or both of plaintiffs’ claims for asbestos-related injuries. Defendants contend that the New Jersey tolling statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-22, is unconstitutional as an impermissible burden on interstate commerce under the dictates of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bendix Autolite Corporation v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc., — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2218, 100 L.Ed.2d 896 (1988). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Charles Gendler & Co. v. Telecom Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crespo v. StapfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Crespo v. StapfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Ragan v. DukesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992