Duncan v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
Russell Lee Duncan Jr. argues that the superior court erroneously denied his motion *469to suppress. Duncan contended that the police illegally searched him when they contacted him following a citizen’s complaint. We conclude that the police had probable cause to arrest Duncan, and that the search was a lawful search incident to arrest. Therefore, we uphold Duncan’s conviction.
Background facts and proceedings
On May 17, 2005, Adam Glazer, the owner of a business in downtown Anchorage, called the Anchorage Police to complain about drug dealing occurring outside his business…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- McCoy v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Moreau v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
- Phillip Alexander Duty v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023