Legal Opinion
Universal Radiator Products Co. v. Craftsman Radiator Enclosure Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1933No. 5664PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is an action for relief by injunction and damages for the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,807,352, issued to Samuel Tánger, for radiator inelosure, granted May 26, 1931, on an application filed March 25, 1930.
Defendant interposed an answer denying that it has committed any act of infringement of said patent, and denying that said Tánger was the first, original, and solo inventor or discoverer, or any inventor or discoverer of defendant’s radiator inclosure as made subsequent to the grant of said patent, and avers that, in so far as the said patent purports…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Roemer v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Western Glass Co. v. Schmertz Wire-Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
- Frankart, Inc. v. Metal Lamp CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kaumagraph Co. v. General Trade Mark CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935